You need a short record that lets a landlord make one decision, not a long maintenance history. These prompts help you turn reports, contractor comments, photographs and quotes into an update with a clear written instruction. They suit property managers who need to show what was known when approval was requested.
Choose the right prompt
Start with the material you actually have. Do not force a full approval request from an incomplete quote.
| If you have | Use | The landlord is being asked to |
|---|---|---|
| One finding and one clear scope | Standard repair decision note | Approve or decline the work |
| Two or more viable scopes or quotes | Quoted options comparison | Select an option or request more information |
| A possible immediate risk or attendance issue | Urgent works authority request | Authorise work, investigation or a hold |
| Evidence scattered across notes and images | Photograph and findings summary | Decide whether the evidence supports a next step |
| A quote that cannot be approved safely | Incomplete quote follow-up | Request clarification or another quote |
Key point
Ask for one instruction
A useful landlord update ends with a choice the landlord can answer in one reply.
Prepare the source material
Before pasting anything, create a working note headed with the property address and repair reference. Put the following items under separate labels. This makes omissions visible before they reach the landlord.
- The original reported issue, including date and who reported it.
- Occupancy status and any access constraint.
- Inspection observations, separated from opinions about cause.
- Contractor findings and the proposed scope.
- Each quote, including whether VAT is stated, exclusions and availability.
- A sentence for each photograph: location, what is visible and date if known.
- Any action already taken, who authorised it and the stated cost.
- The approval you want, such as approval of a named scope, selection of an option, or authority to obtain a further quote.
Paste the source text under the matching placeholder. Keep the contractor's wording where it matters. For example, paste "possible water ingress" rather than changing it to "water ingress". The first is an opinion that may need investigation. The second reads as an established fact.
Watch out
Do not turn a photo into a diagnosis
A photograph can show staining, a cracked tile or a damaged handle. It may not establish the cause, extent or responsibility.
Make the approval request auditable
Use the prompt's response line rather than ending with a broad question such as "Please advise". A recorded answer such as OPTION 2 or AUTHORISE is easier to match to the scope and quote later.
Where the work is urgent, distinguish between three things in the source material:
- What has already happened, such as an attendance visit or temporary isolation.
- What is confirmed, such as a visible leak or loss of power.
- What you want approved next, such as investigation, temporary protection or full remedial work.
This prevents a landlord from believing they approved a full repair when they approved an inspection only. If there is an existing instruction or spending authority, paste its exact wording. Do not describe it as covering new work unless it explicitly does.
Note
Keep facts and opinions separate
Label contractor views as contractor assessment. This lets the landlord see what was observed and what still needs confirmation.
Check the output before sending
Read the final note against the original report, quote and image descriptions. The model can organise the information, but it cannot verify the site, the contractor or the price. Check these points in order:
- Confirm the property address, repair location and occupancy status are correct.
- Match every stated price to the quote. Check whether the figure includes VAT and whether it is a total, estimate or limit.
- Check the proposed work matches the contractor's scope. Look closely for omitted exclusions, access costs or making-good work.
- Check each photo statement says only what is visible from the description you supplied.
- Remove any implied conclusion about urgency, cause, compliance, liability or tenant responsibility that is not supported by the source material.
- Make sure the final request is one decision, with the intended option or authority stated in full.
Check
The note is ready when
You can point to a source for every fact, and the landlord can reply with one unambiguous instruction.
Signs the output is wrong
Treat the output as wrong if it fills a gap with a confident-sounding detail. Common examples are adding a VAT assumption, naming a cause of damage from a photograph, describing an estimate as a fixed quote, or calling work urgent because it sounds serious.
Also check for a recommendation that does not explain its basis. An option may be available sooner, but that does not make it preferable if its scope excludes the repair actually identified. Where the options are not comparable, send the clarification request instead of asking the landlord to choose.
If you are using attachments or a workflow that handles documents differently, check the current guidance in the xAI documentation overview. Treat the original report, quote and photographs as the record, not the generated summary.
When the prompt does not work
Do not keep rephrasing the same incomplete material. Return to the missing field. Ask the contractor for an itemised scope, VAT position, exclusions, availability or confirmation of the finding. Ask the reporting person for the exact location, date or photograph description if that is unclear.
Then run the appropriate prompt again with the new information. If the landlord's requested decision is still not defined, use the options comparison or holding update. A shorter note that requests clarification is better than an approval request built on assumptions.